Security

FSI scholars produce research aimed at creating a safer world and examing the consequences of security policies on institutions and society. They look at longstanding issues including nuclear nonproliferation and the conflicts between countries like North and South Korea. But their research also examines new and emerging areas that transcend traditional borders – the drug war in Mexico and expanding terrorism networks. FSI researchers look at the changing methods of warfare with a focus on biosecurity and nuclear risk. They tackle cybersecurity with an eye toward privacy concerns and explore the implications of new actors like hackers.

Along with the changing face of conflict, terrorism and crime, FSI researchers study food security. They tackle the global problems of hunger, poverty and environmental degradation by generating knowledge and policy-relevant solutions. 

Paragraphs

A portion of President Bush's 2002 nuclear posture was released or leaked recently. The posture is largely silent on international cooperation and largely negative on arms control. The main relatively new trend in the posture is that the US will be prepared to use nuclear weapons in a much wider range of circumstances than before, with a particular emphasis on tactical uses. Such an emphasis in a declaratory policy has not been seen since the days of "flexible response" forty or so years ago, when tactical nuclear weapons were deployed in Europe and elsewhere. Supporting that trend, the posture states that the infrastructure for those expanded missions will be built up, including the design and production of new nuclear weapons; and that arms control measures, such as SALT II and the CTBT, will not stand in the way.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Working Papers
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
52nd Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs
Authors
Paragraphs

The anthrax attacks in fall 2001, and the fear and confusion that followed, made it all too clear that the United States lacks a comprehensive strategy for coping with bioterrorism. For too long, thinking about biological weapons has been held hostage to misplaced analogies to nuclear or chemical weapons. An effective strategy must begin by focusing on the special challenges posed by biological threats.

Reprinted in R.D. Howard and R.L. Sawyer, eds., Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding the New Security Environment (Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin, 2002), pp. 174-184.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
Foreign Affairs
Authors
-

Reuben W. Hills Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Encina Hall East

Martha Crenshaw John E. Andrus Professor of Government Speaker Wesleyan University
Seminars
-

Reuben W. Hills Conference Room, 2nd floor, Encina Hall East

Stathis Kalyvas Associate Professor Speaker Department of Political Science, University of Chicago
Seminars
-

Reuben W. Hills Conference Room, 2nd floor, Encina Hall East

James Bamford Visiting Professor Speaker University of California, Berkeley
Seminars
-
Donald Kennedy Bing Professor of Environmental Science and Policy Speaker Stanford University
Seminars
-

Reuben W. Hills Conference Room, 2nd floor, Encina Hall East

William Priedhorsky, Ph.D. Speaker Los Alamos National Laboratory
Seminars
-

Reuben W. Hills Conference Room, 2nd floor, Encina Hall East

Paul Collier Director Speaker Development Research Group, The World Bank
Seminars
Subscribe to Security