Responding to Catastrophe: Democratic Responses to Complex Humanitarian Emergencies
Why do Western democracies respond militarily to complex humanitarian emergencies when and as they do? Why do they send peacekeepers or combat forces to some conflicts and not others? When they do so, how do they choose the political goals, military strategies, and military resources that they contribute to these operations? I will explain what I mean by the term ‘complex humanitarian emergency,' and lay out the humanitarian implications of different kinds of military responses. To illustrate, I will provide a few examples of complex emergencies and Western responses to them. I will also offer some ideas about the factors that influence these policy decisions, and demonstrate their importance with a few comparative examples of Australian responses to complex humanitarian emergencies in its region.
Andrea Everett is a 2009-2010 CISAC visiting scholar. A Ph.D candidate in international relations at the
Department of Politics at Princeton
University, she is also a 2004 CISAC Undergraduate Honors Program graduate. After
graduating from Stanford but before arriving at Princeton, Andrea spent a year
studying transatlantic relations in Berlin,
Germany on a
Fulbright scholarship.
Andrea's research interests include international security and comparative
democratic foreign policy. She is especially interested in the role of domestic
political influences on democratic states' foreign policy decisions in the
security arena. Her dissertation, "Responding to Catastrophe: Explaining
Democratic Responsiveness to Complex Emergencies," seeks to explain why Western
democracies respond to complex humanitarian emergencies abroad when and as they
do. She focuses on understanding when and how these states decide to use
military force in pursuit of positive humanitarian outcomes, and investigates
the roles of public pressure, characteristics of complex emergencies, military
capabilities, and national interests in these decisions.
Kenneth Schultz is an associate professor of political science at Stanford University and an affiliated faculty member at CISAC. His research examines how domestic political factors such as elections, party competition, and public opinion influence decisions to use force in international disputes and efforts to negotiate the end of international rivalries.
He is the author of Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy (Cambridge, 2001), as well as a number of articles in scholarly journals. He is the recipient of several awards, including the 2003 Karl Deutsch Award, given by the International Studies Association to a scholar under the age of 40 who is judged to have made the most significant contribution to the study of international relations and peace research. Schultz received his BA in Russian and Soviet studies from Harvard University and his PhD in political science from Stanford University.
Reuben W. Hills Conference Room
Kenneth A. Schultz
Department of Political Science
Stanford University
Encina Hall West
Stanford, CA 94305-6044
Kenneth A. Schultz is professor of political science and a CISAC core faculty member at Stanford University. His research examines international conflict and conflict resolution, with a particular focus on the domestic political influences on foreign policy choices. He is the author of Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy and World Politics: Interests, Interactions, and Institutions (with David Lake and Jeffry Frieden), as well as numerous articles in peer-reviewed scholarly journals. He was the recipient the 2003 Karl Deutsch Award, given by the International Studies Association, and a 2011 Dean’s Award for Distinguished Teaching, awarded by Stanford’s School of Humanities and Sciences. He received his PhD in political science from Stanford University.