CISAC - News Page

News
Filter:
Show Hide
Ex: author name, topic, etc.
Ex: author name, topic, etc.
By Topic
Show Hide
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
By Region
Show Hide
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
  • Expanded
By Type
Show Hide
By date
Show Hide
Steven Pifer
Beijing, China
Commentary
Commentary

The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty lapsed on February 5, 2026. U.S. President Donald Trump has said he will seek a better agreement, and Washington wants to bring in China and limit all Russian nuclear warheads, not just the deployed strategic warheads captured by New START.

President Trump returned to the White House in 2025 claiming he would quickly end the Russia-Ukraine war. But the sides today remain far apart on key issues while the war rages on.

Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed in his end-of-the-year press conference that Western “promises that they had given us about refraining from expanding NATO were being ignored.”

The 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) is on the path to a quiet death in two months. The treaty’s demise will end the last agreement constraining US and Russian nuclear weapons.

Commentary

A flurry of diplomacy over the weekend seems to have improved Ukraine’s position.

While Ukraine faces steep challenges, several recent developments could strengthen Kyiv’s hand.

In an October 29 Truth Social post, President Donald Trump said he had ordered the Defense Department to resume testing U.S. nuclear weapons. Four days later, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright clarified that the United States did not intend to conduct nuclear explosive tests.

With the [New START] treaty due to expire in February 2026, the Trump administration must decide how to respond to a Russian proposal to extend the treaty’s quantitative limits for one year.

Commentary

European leaders came to Washington to bolster Zelensky’s position following Trump’s grievous Alaska conversation with Russian President Putin.

Commentary

President Donald Trump traveled to Alaska on August 15 intending to get Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire.

FSI scholars Michael McFaul, Steven Pifer, and Rose Gottemoeller analyze the Alaska meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and its implications for Ukraine’s security and sovereignty.

The Europeans are coming to Washington in an attempt to salvage Ukraine’s position.

Commentary

Is Trump prepared to play tough with Putin?

Trump set earlier deadlines for the Kremlin and took no action when they passed. Also, his threatened punitive steps may not worry Putin much.

Commentary

For a U.S. administration claiming that it wants to restore American power in order, among other things, to negotiate from a position of strength, the past week has not advanced the cause.

Putin has taken no serious steps in response to Trump’s calls to halt the fighting. Trump should therefore back his words with actions.

A just and durable peace that brings an end to this brutal war would certainly be welcome. However, the details described by Witkoff to date leave considerable doubt about the prospects of his plan.

President Donald Trump has expressed interest in “denuclearization.” However, negotiation of a follow-on agreement would have to deal with difficult issues of substance.

Ukrainians have several reasons for opposing a stand-alone ceasefire.

Steven Pifer joins Michael McFaul on World Class to discuss how America's relationship with Ukraine and Europe is shifting, and what that means for the future of international security.

February 28 will go down as a bad day for Ukraine and a good one for the Kremlin.

Commentary

The president gave the Russian dictator the best run of good news he’s had in years.