Sheena Chestnut: What does China's rise really mean?
CISAC's Tom Isaacs participated in a discussion on nuclear energy in America for the World Affairs Council Northern California.
Event Description:
The 8.9 earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan on March 11, 2011 set in motion one of the largest nuclear disasters in almost three decades. It also renewed the debate over the future of nuclear energy in the US and abroad. With 104 nuclear power plants across the country, generating about 20 percent of America's energy, there is no doubt that we are currently dependent on nuclear energy, yet the debate over this highly contentious technology is far from resolved. The three panelists will discuss what this disaster means for the future of US energy. How will the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant shape future energy policies and public opinion, and are there existing renewable technologies capable of fulfilling the world’s energy needs? Will nuclear energy be the fuel of the 21st century, or a relic of the past?
Listen to the talk by clicking the link below.
Tom is Co-Principal Investigator for the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) Developing Spent Fuel Strategies (DSFS) project coordinating international cooperation on issues at the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle with emphasis on spent fuel management and disposal in Pacific Rim countries. Participants include senior nuclear officials from Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Canada, and the United States.
Tom advises national nuclear waste programs on facility siting, communications, stakeholder engagement, and public trust and confidence. He has worked with the Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) for 15 years.
Tom was recently named as the Chair of the recently formed Experts Team to support Southern California Edison at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Previously Tom was a Consulting Professor at CISAC, lead advisor to the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Member of the National Academy of Sciences Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Director of Planning at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and long time senior executive at the Department of Energy where he led the siting of Yucca Mountain as the nation’s candidate site for a geologic repository.
He has degrees in Engineering, Applied Physics, and Chemical Engineering from Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania.
Congratulations to the 10 members of the Class of 2011 CISAC Honors Program in International Security Studies. The students were honored at a June 10 ceremony for their successful participation in the interdisciplinary program and for their contributions to the field of international security research.
The Stanford seniors join 114 others who have graduated from the program since its inception in 2000. This year's program was co-directed by Coit D. Blacker and Martha Crenshaw, with assistance from teaching assistant Michael Sulmeyer.
In alphabetical order, the students, their majors, and their thesis titles are:
Devin Banerjee
Management Science and Engineering
India's Red Stain: Explaining the Indian Government's Ineffective Response to the Maoist-Naxalite Insurgency Since 1967.
Peter Davis
International Relations
The Non-Aligned Movement: A Struggle for Global Relevance
Biology
The Demise and Rise of Governance in Health Systems: A Path Forward
RJ Halperin
Political Science
The U.S. and the Origins of the Pakistani Nuclear Weapons Program: National Interests, Proliferation Pessimism, and Executive-Legislative Politics
Akhil Iyer
International Relations, Minor in Arabic
The Establishment of the U.S. Africa Command: Form, Function, and the Process of Agency Formation
Astasia Myers
Political Science and International Relations, Minor in Economics
IAEA Enforcement of Nuclear Nonproliferation Violators: Are Some Animals More Equal than Others?
Jimmy Ruck
History
Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon? Evolving Civil Military-Relations in China
Engineering Physics and International Relations
Sunny Side Up: Characterizing the U.S. Military's Approach to Solar Energy Policy
* Recipient of the William J. Perry Award
Jaclyn Tandler
International Relations
Let Them Eat Yellow Cake: Understanding the History of France's Sensitive Nuclear Export Policy
*Recipient of the Firestone Medal
Shine Zaw-Aung
International Relations, Minor in Energy Engineering
The Third Horseman: On Famines and Governments
The Center for International Security and Cooperation is pleased to announce the selection of 13 rising seniors for participation in its Undergraduate Honors Program in International Security Studies.
The program provides an opportunity for eligible students focusing on international security subjects in any field to earn an honors certificate.
Students selected intern with a security-related organization, attend the program's honors college in Washington, D.C. in September, participate in a year-long core seminar on international security research, and produce an honors thesis with policy implications.
Joshua Alvarez
International Relations, Minor in Economics
Identity and Security: Turkey's Grand Strategy in the Middle East
Keshia Bonner
International Relations, Minor in Economics
United States Policy Towards Hamas and Hezbollah as State Actors
Stephen Craig
Political Science
Security Issues and Domestic Constraints on European Integration
Noura Elfarra
Political Science
How does Regime Change and Revolution Affect the Secret Police?
Alison Epstein
International Relations
British and American Intelligence Cooperation: the Iraq Inquiry and the New Face of the Special Relationship
Peter Hong
Political Science
Recalibrating and Resolving Deficiencies in Multinational Nuclear Fuel Cycle Initiatives
Mohammad Islam
Electrical Engineering, Minor in International Relations
Domestic Terrorism Prevention Strategies in the US and UK
Suraya Omar
Materials Science and Engineering
North Korea's Ambitions for a Light Water Reactor
Clay Ramel
Science, Technology & Society – Energy Engineering Concentration
National Security Dimensions of Developing an Energy Secure United States
Nick Rosellini
International Relations, Minor in Economics & Modern Languages
The NATO Strategic Concept: Evolution of a Nuclear Posture 1957-2010
Ram Sachs
Earth Systems, Minor in Modern Languages
Environmental Dimensions of Security - Yemen and Violent Extremism
Jeffrey Sweet
Materials Science and Engineering
The Effect of Public Perceptions of Diseases such as HIV, H1N1, SARS, and Anthrax on the Effectiveness of Controlling Epidemics
Reagan Thompson
International Relations, Minor in Chinese
The Chinese Influence in Africa: Case Studies of Ghana and Angola
(Russian/Ukraine/USA, 2006; dir. Thomas Johnson; 93 min.)
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
7:00 pm - 9:00 pm (*NEW TIME*)
Cubberly Auditorium
Free and open to the public
On April 26, 1986, a reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukrainian city of Pripyat exploded and began spewing radioactive smoke and gas. More than 40,000 residents in the immediate area were exposed to fallout a hundred times greater than that from the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan. Based on top-secret government documents that came to light only after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1999, The Battle of Chernobyl reveals a systematic cover-up of the true scope of the disaster, including the possibility of a secondary explosion of the still-smoldering magma, whose radioactive clouds would have rendered Europe uninhabitable.
Co-sponsored by the School of Education, Crothers Global Citizenship, Stanford Continuing Studies, Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, and the Stanford Film Society
For more information, visit the CREEES Event Website.
Cubberley Auditorium
Ten undergraduates recently received the 2011 Deans' Award for Academic Accomplishment, which honors extraordinary undergraduate students for "exceptional, tangible" intellectual achievements. Among them: CISAC honors student Anand Habib, a senior majoring in biology with honors in international security studies. He is completing an honors thesis focusing on health governance.
Habib sees his work as an intentional synthesis of scholarship and larger social commitments. He has lived this out in many ways at Stanford, including working on behalf of politically and medically disenfranchised people in India, Mexico and Guatemala. On campus, he has turned the Stanford tradition of the annual Dance Marathon into a vehicle dedicated to addressing the HIV/AIDS pandemic by engaging not only Stanford students but also local communities and corporations, raising more than $100,000. His exceptional work was recognized by his participation in the Clinton Global Initiative University Conference in April.
English Associate Professor Michele Elam described Habib as a "superb critical thinker" whose work is characterized by "creative genius" and "mature insights." She holds him up as a model for others, saying that "he exemplifies exactly the kind of deeply informed, pragmatic and caring leadership that the world needs and Stanford enables."
Martha Crenshaw has been researching terrorist organizations since the late 1960s. In the wake of the U.S. military’s successful mission against Osama bin Laden, she comments on what happens to Al Qaeda now, and the challenges that remain.
CISAC: What does the death of Osama bin Laden mean for the world?
Crenshaw: The killing of bin Laden brings closure to a pursuit that began well before the 9/11 attacks. The successful raid demonstrated American tenacity as well as a somewhat surprising ability to keep a secret over the past several months as American intelligence agencies zeroed in on bin Laden's fortified compound in Abbottabad. Although most of the world thought he was hiding in the mountainous and inaccessible border regions of Pakistan, sheltered by local tribes, he was actually centrally located in a city not too far from Islamabad. It is often said that terrorism cannot be deterred because terrorists have no return address, but it turned out that bin Laden did. After years of patient intelligence work the U.S. finally found it.
CISAC: What happens to Al Qaeda now?
Crenshaw: There are differing opinions. One is that bin Laden is a unique figure and that there's no other leader of a terrorist organization that has the kind of aura he has. People who joined Al Qaeda swore personal allegiance to him. He had this kind of bearing, and they respected his personal piety. It's hard to replace a leader like that. At the same time, that part of the organization affiliated with bin Laden is still a major actor. A lot of attacks, like the London bombing, are traced back toward them. A lot of the failed and foiled attacks in the U.S. were traced back there, too, suggesting he played an operational role as well as an inspirational role.
On the other side, even if Al Qaeda disappeared, other affiliates like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula are still extremely dangerous and capable. They can trade on his reputation and inspire others to join. They might make demands for revenge. There are also those who could replace bin Laden, not so much as an inspirational leader but in terms of operations. The central organization's more visible second in command, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, is free although he will be under intense pressure. There is also a second-tier leadership whose abilities and appeal are largely unknown. Local affiliates such as Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula have often overshadowed AQ central, and in fact AQAP is currently considered to be the most serious threat to US security.
CISAC: It sounds like there is likely to be jockeying for power.
Crenshaw: There certainly will be. Will Zawahiri necessarily step into the No. 1 role now? Or will he be challenged? It's possible. You can kind of see how little we know and how hard it is for the U.S. to piece it together by how long it has taken to find bin Laden. The U.S. has been looking for him since 1998.
CISAC: Does that make things more or less dangerous?
Crenshaw: There's a theory that the more fragmentation you have, the higher the level of violence. The way you get more resources and support is to be more audacious than your rivals. You could have violence from one faction against another. There's also the idea that you attack your enemy to show how dangerous you really are. Nobody wants to be seen as weak, so they feel that they have to do what the other side is doing.