In the quest for technological superiority, military strategists are looking into AI systems like language models for decision-making, driven by their success surpassing human capabilities in various tasks. Yet, as the integration of language models into military planning is tested, we face a grave risk: the potential for AI to escalate conflicts unintentionally. While promising in efficiency and scope, deploying these models raises urgent ethical and safety concerns. We must scrutinize the implications of relying on AI in situations where a single misstep could have dire global repercussions.

The Potential of AI Decision-Making

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force across domains, with AI systems reaching and even surpassing human capabilities in many tasks. Notable examples include DeepMind's AlphaGo defeating world champions in Go, Meta's Cicero AI beating experts in strategic board game Diplomacy, and generative language models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT creating human-like text and passing high-school exams.

AI's success in strategy games, demonstrated by narrow-task systems like AlphaGo, has sparked interest from military strategists. However, language models offer even greater potential due to their exceptional versatility. Unlike narrow-task systems, language models can be applied to any task articulated in natural language, leveraging vast cross-domain information. This adaptability makes them particularly attractive for military applications requiring rapid processing and synthesis of diverse data. Current research trends towards multi-modal models, incorporating visual elements alongside text, potentially enhancing their utility in strategic decision-making contexts.

Continue reading at carnegiecouncil.org