These Factors Complicate NATO's New Spending Pledge
These Factors Complicate NATO's New Spending Pledge
Insights from CISAC Affiliate Anja Manuel
Photo Credit: iStock
NATO's 5% spending commitment is a watershed moment for an alliance dogged by laggard investment outside the U.S. — if, that is, members actually fork over the trillions in long-term spending required to make it a reality.
Why it matters: At a time of weapons upheaval and global war, friends are precious.
- New blocs of influence are solidifying. China, Iran and North Korea fuel a Russian war machine in Eastern Europe while the U.S. reevaluates its role abroad, including arms deliveries.
- There's a newfound determination in many capitals to invest in European security and reduce reliance on Washington.
- The question is whether it's a fleeting feeling or the beginnings of a decade-long push to hit 5%.
The big picture: The spending outlook, according to defense analysts, industry executives and Europe watchers Axios consulted, is complicated by these four factors:
Proximity and fears of invasion.
Continue reading at axios.com